netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vfalico@redhat.com, lkml@tlinx.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	fubar@us.ibm.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net
Subject: [PATCH] bonding: don't call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:31:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363105892-3172-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)

bond_update_speed_duplex() might sleep while calling underlying slave's
routines. Move it out of atomic context in bond_enslave() and remove it
from bond_miimon_commit() - it was introduced by commit 546add79, however
when the slave interfaces go up/change state it's their responsibility to
fire NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGE events so that bonding can properly update
their speed.

I've tested it on all combinations of ifup/ifdown, autoneg/speed/duplex
changes, remote-controlled and local, on (not) MII-based cards. All changes
are visible.

Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    6 ++----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 8b4e96e..6bbd90e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1746,6 +1746,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 
 	bond_compute_features(bond);
 
+	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
+
 	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 
 	new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies -
@@ -1798,8 +1800,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 		new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_DOWN ? "DOWN" :
 			(new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP ? "UP" : "BACK"));
 
-	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
-
 	if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && bond->params.primary[0]) {
 		/* if there is a primary slave, remember it */
 		if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0) {
@@ -2374,8 +2374,6 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 				bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
 			}
 
-			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
-
 			pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %u Mbps %s duplex.\n",
 				bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
 				slave->speed, slave->duplex ? "full" : "half");
-- 
1.7.1

             reply	other threads:[~2013-03-12 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-12 16:31 Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-03-13  8:53 ` [PATCH] bonding: don't call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363105892-3172-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
    --to=vfalico@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).