From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: linux-sctp@vger.kernel-org
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Xufeng Zhang <xufengzhang.main@gmail.com>,
vyasevich@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sctp: optimize searching the active path for tsns
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:29:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363109382-753-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513F5120.7090209@gmail.com>
SCTP currently attempts to optimize the search for tsns on a transport by first
checking the active_path, then searching alternate transports. This operation
however is a bit convoluted, as we explicitly search the active path, then serch
all other transports, skipping the active path, when its detected. Lets
optimize this by preforming a move to front on the transport_addr_list every
time the active_path is changed. The active_path changes occur in relatively
non-critical paths, and doing so allows us to just search the
transport_addr_list in order, avoiding an extra conditional check in the
relatively hot tsn lookup path. This also happens to fix a bug where we break
out of the for loop early in the tsn lookup.
CC: Xufeng Zhang <xufengzhang.main@gmail.com>
CC: vyasevich@gmail.com
CC: davem@davemloft.net
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
net/sctp/associola.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
index 43cd0dd..7af96b3 100644
--- a/net/sctp/associola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
@@ -513,8 +513,11 @@ void sctp_assoc_set_primary(struct sctp_association *asoc,
* user wants to use this new path.
*/
if ((transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) ||
- (transport->state == SCTP_UNKNOWN))
+ (transport->state == SCTP_UNKNOWN)) {
+ list_del_rcu(&transport->transports);
+ list_add_rcu(&transport->transports, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list);
asoc->peer.active_path = transport;
+ }
/*
* SFR-CACC algorithm:
@@ -964,6 +967,10 @@ void sctp_assoc_control_transport(struct sctp_association *asoc,
}
/* Set the active and retran transports. */
+ if (asoc->peer.active_path != first) {
+ list_del_rcu(first);
+ list_add_rcu(first, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list);
+ }
asoc->peer.active_path = first;
asoc->peer.retran_path = second;
}
@@ -1040,7 +1047,6 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_lookup_tsn(struct sctp_association *asoc,
__u32 tsn)
{
- struct sctp_transport *active;
struct sctp_transport *match;
struct sctp_transport *transport;
struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
@@ -1057,29 +1063,16 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_lookup_tsn(struct sctp_association *asoc,
* The general strategy is to search each transport's transmitted
* list. Return which transport this TSN lives on.
*
- * Let's be hopeful and check the active_path first.
- * Another optimization would be to know if there is only one
- * outbound path and not have to look for the TSN at all.
+ * Note, that sctp_assoc_set_primary does a move to front operation
+ * on the active_path transport, so this code implicitly checks
+ * the active_path first, as we most commonly expect to find our TSN
+ * there.
*
*/
- active = asoc->peer.active_path;
-
- list_for_each_entry(chunk, &active->transmitted,
- transmitted_list) {
-
- if (key == chunk->subh.data_hdr->tsn) {
- match = active;
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- /* If not found, go search all the other transports. */
list_for_each_entry(transport, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
transports) {
- if (transport == active)
- break;
list_for_each_entry(chunk, &transport->transmitted,
transmitted_list) {
if (key == chunk->subh.data_hdr->tsn) {
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 7:39 [PATCH] sctp: don't break the loop while meeting the active_path so as to find the matched transport Xufeng Zhang
2013-03-08 14:27 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-11 2:14 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-03-11 13:31 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-12 2:24 ` Xufeng Zhang
2013-03-12 11:30 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-12 12:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-12 15:44 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-12 16:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-12 17:29 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2013-03-12 21:01 ` [PATCH] sctp: optimize searching the active path for tsns Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-13 1:20 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-13 1:43 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-13 13:28 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-13 14:06 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-13 14:21 ` Neil Horman
2013-03-13 16:40 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-13 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-13 13:33 ` [PATCH] sctp: don't break the loop while meeting the active_path so as to find the matched transport Neil Horman
2013-03-13 13:52 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-03-13 14:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363109382-753-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel-org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=xufengzhang.main@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).