From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:10:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363245040.14913.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314013702.GA4129@order.stressinduktion.org>
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 02:37 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> [PATCH net] inet: limit length of fragment queue hash table bucket lists
>
> This patch introduces a constant limit of the fragment queue hash
> table bucket list lengths. Currently the limit 128 is choosen somewhat
> arbitrary and just ensures that we can fill up the fragment cache with
> empty packets up to the default ip_frag_high_thresh limits. It should
> just protect from list iteration eating considerable amounts of cpu.
>
> If we reach the maximum length in one hash bucket a warning is printed.
> This is implemented on the caller side of inet_frag_find to distinguish
> between the different users of inet_fragment.c.
I like the idea of having a safe guard on the fragment queue hash table
bucket list lengths. But I'm considering another cleanup/evictor
strategy, where we drop the LRU list, and do frag eviction on a hash
bucket level (which will be more cache optimal). This strategy would
also involve a list length limit.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 21:42 [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 5:57 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 13:04 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:08 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:54 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 16:18 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-09 15:19 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 20:53 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:27 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 1:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 1:37 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 4:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-03-14 7:14 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:47 ` David Laight
2013-03-14 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 12:34 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-03-14 7:23 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 7:28 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14 9:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 12:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363245040.14913.11.camel@localhost \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).