netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:10:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363245040.14913.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314013702.GA4129@order.stressinduktion.org>

On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 02:37 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:

> [PATCH net] inet: limit length of fragment queue hash table bucket lists
> 
> This patch introduces a constant limit of the fragment queue hash
> table bucket list lengths. Currently the limit 128 is choosen somewhat
> arbitrary and just ensures that we can fill up the fragment cache with
> empty packets up to the default ip_frag_high_thresh limits. It should
> just protect from list iteration eating considerable amounts of cpu.
> 
> If we reach the maximum length in one hash bucket a warning is printed.
> This is implemented on the caller side of inet_frag_find to distinguish
> between the different users of inet_fragment.c.

I like the idea of having a safe guard on the fragment queue hash table
bucket list lengths.  But I'm considering another cleanup/evictor
strategy, where we drop the LRU list, and do frag eviction on a hash
bucket level (which will be more cache optimal).  This strategy would
also involve a list length limit.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-07 21:42 [PATCH RFC] ipv6: use stronger hash for reassembly queue hash table Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08  5:57 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 13:04   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 14:53     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:08       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 15:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 15:54           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 16:15             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-08 16:18               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-09 15:19             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-08 20:53           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13  1:27           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13  1:31             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-13  5:29             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14  1:37               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14  4:36                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-03-14  7:14                   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14  9:47                     ` David Laight
2013-03-14 10:34                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-14 12:34                       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14  7:10                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2013-03-14  7:23                   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14  7:28                     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-14  9:18                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-03-14 12:45                         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363245040.14913.11.camel@localhost \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).