From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>,
Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:22:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363900923-3244-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> (raw)
If bpf_jit_enable > 1, then we dump the emitted JIT compiled image
after creation. Currently, only SPARC and PowerPC has similar output
as in the reference implementation on x86_64. Make a small helper
function in order to reduce duplicated code and make the dump output
uniform across architectures x86_64, SPARC, PPC, ARM (e.g. on ARM
flen, pass and proglen are currently not shown, but would be
interesting to know as well), also for future BPF JIT implementations
on other archs.
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@google.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 5 ++---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 12 ++++--------
arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +-----
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 ++-------
include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++++++++++
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 6828ef6..ef4d571 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -918,9 +918,8 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
#endif
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "BPF JIT code: ",
- DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 4, ctx.target,
- alloc_size, false);
+ /* there are 2 passes here */
+ bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target);
fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
out:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index e834f1e..c427ae3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -671,16 +671,12 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
}
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- pr_info("flen=%d proglen=%u pass=%d image=%p\n",
- flen, proglen, pass, image);
+ /* Note that we output the base address of the code_base
+ * rather than image, since opcodes are in code_base.
+ */
+ bpf_jit_dump(flen, proglen, pass, code_base);
if (image) {
- if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "JIT code: ",
- DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
- 16, 1, code_base,
- proglen, false);
-
bpf_flush_icache(code_base, code_base + (proglen/4));
/* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */
((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 3109ca6..d36a85e 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -795,13 +795,9 @@ cond_branch: f_offset = addrs[i + filter[i].jf];
}
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- pr_err("flen=%d proglen=%u pass=%d image=%p\n",
- flen, proglen, pass, image);
+ bpf_jit_dump(flen, proglen, pass, image);
if (image) {
- if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "JIT code: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
- 16, 1, image, proglen, false);
bpf_flush_icache(image, image + proglen);
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 3cbe4538..f66b540 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -725,17 +725,12 @@ cond_branch: f_offset = addrs[i + filter[i].jf] - addrs[i];
}
oldproglen = proglen;
}
+
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- pr_err("flen=%d proglen=%u pass=%d image=%p\n",
- flen, proglen, pass, image);
+ bpf_jit_dump(flen, proglen, pass, image);
if (image) {
- if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
- print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "JIT code: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
- 16, 1, image, proglen, false);
-
bpf_flush_icache(image, image + proglen);
-
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
}
out:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index c45eabc..cc10c5c 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -50,6 +50,16 @@ extern int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *filter, uns
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
extern void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp);
extern void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp);
+
+static inline void bpf_jit_dump(unsigned int flen, unsigned int proglen,
+ u32 pass, void *image)
+{
+ pr_err("flen=%u proglen=%u pass=%u image=%p\n",
+ flen, proglen, pass, image);
+ if (image)
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "JIT code: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS,
+ 16, 1, image, proglen, false);
+}
#define SK_RUN_FILTER(FILTER, SKB) (*FILTER->bpf_func)(SKB, FILTER->insns)
#else
static inline void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 21:22 Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-03-21 21:26 ` [PATCH net-next] filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363900923-3244-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@google.com \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgherzan@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).