From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix tentative IPv6 address due to DAD looping back Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:47:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1363963666.4431.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <514C6CAA.2090902@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Meng, Jilin" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org" , "kaber@trash.net" , "Sun, Yinglin" , "Prithviraj, Lakshmanan" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:50841 "EHLO mail-pb0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933169Ab3CVOru (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:47:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id um15so3142378pbc.14 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:47:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <514C6CAA.2090902@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 18:37 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Don't we have memcmp() in Linux? > Dont use slow memcmp() in this context but fast ether_addr_equal_64bits()