From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: frag queue per hash bucket locking Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:22:44 -0700 Message-ID: <1364502164.15753.56.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130327155238.15203.6688.stgit@dragon> <20130327155601.15203.25289.stgit@dragon> <1364405159.15753.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130328185721.GA20223@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , Daniel Borkmann To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:35246 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752568Ab3C1UWq (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:22:46 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 3so1124506pdj.27 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:22:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130328185721.GA20223@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:57 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > I assume that it has to do with the usage of this code in > ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c, which could be invoked from process > context, if I read it correctly. Then there would be a possible deadlock in current code.