From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] fec: Fix PHC device log Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:10:24 -0700 Message-ID: <1365873024.2358.7.camel@joe-AO722> References: <1365871134-6834-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <1365871779.2358.3.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Frank.Li@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam To: Fabio Estevam Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:48151 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753494Ab3DMRKY (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:10:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 13:54 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Maybe better as: > > netdev_info(ndev, "registered PHC device %d\n", fep->dev_id); > > In this case I get: > > fec 2188000.ethernet (unregistered net_device): registered PHC device 0 Everything in fec_probe between the alloc_etherdev and register_netdev would get that, but the actual registered netdev name perhaps is not guaranteed to be fep->dev_id.