From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Could one of you guys take a look at a SCSI FCoE patch for me? Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:49:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1365972574.2359.14.camel@dabdike> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:52471 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753689Ab3DNUtj (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:49:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411FD8EE0F1 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCV3SykJsCrS for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.6.205] (ip-64-134-140-85.public.wayport.net [64.134.140.85]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27CFD8EE0A4 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: It's this one: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=136183795505630 It's trying to do some FCoE VLAN discovery protocol, but as I think I read the patch, it seems to set up a VLAN on the NIC without any reference to the existing net based VLAN infrastructure, so I had a couple of questions 1. Is that right? I'm not very familiar with the net code so I might be misreading 2. Is that acceptable to net people? Thanks, James