ECMP ipv6 vs ipv4

[Wilco Baan Hofman <wilco@baanhofman.nl>]

Hi,

I'm working on a patch to implement 'nexthop weight' for multipath ipv6.
However, the ECMPv6 implementation has a few flaws that are quite
annoying.

One of the flaws is that the netlink nexthop API is asymmetrical, you
can add nexthops through the netlink API, but when the result is
requested it is completely different, resulting in bird6 removing the
route as it does not match the initial route set.

Another one of the flaws is that if I add nexthop weight or algorithm
(weighted hash or weighted random) I need to add this to the main rt
node, this seems like an inefficient memory structure, as this needs to
be added to all the siblings as well.

I propose that we have a nexthop structure to an exclusive route,
similar what we have for IPv4, where we store the gateway, device and
weight for all nexthops and the algorithm in the route. This would make
the netlink API symmetrical again and fixes the n*n inefficiencies when
adding routes (all siblings need to know about all siblings).

What are your thoughts on this?

Regards,

Wilco Baan Hofman