From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] fec: Use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:49:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1366134545.28609.1.camel@joe-AO722> References: <1366120731-31427-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <516D60E0.6000107@cogentembedded.com> <516D8649.4030604@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabio Estevam , Fabio Estevam , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:42786 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965079Ab3DPRtF (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:49:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <516D8649.4030604@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 21:11 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 16-04-2013 19:22, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(fec_pm_ops, fec_suspend, fec_resume); > >>> +#define FEC_PM_OPS (&fec_pm_ops) > >> Nit: parens are useless here. Is this macro indirection even useful? Using &fec_pm_ops seems quite readable.