public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet overflow
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:41:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366814464.8964.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5177D771.6050307@mojatatu.com>

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 09:00 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> I forgot about the Toepliz hash connection. I can see it makes sense here.
> 
> Let me clarify:
> In the scenario i am thinking of, I have clever hardware which is smart 
> enough to deal with details of identifying flow state(including 
> fragementation etc) and tagging it in a DMA descriptor with 32 bit id.
> I want to be able to take the tag produced by the hardware and use
> that for rps cpu selection i.e assume the hardware has already done the
> hashing and is giving me a 32 bit id. My initial thought was skb->rxhash
> is the right spot to store this; then make get_rps_cpu() do the
> selection based on this. l4 rxhash is 1 bit which is too small.

Set skb->rxrhash to the hash your hardware computed, and skb->l4_rxhash
to 1.

Then get_rps_cpu() will use skb->rxhash happily

(and other callers of skb_get_rxhash() as well)

Not clear what you mean by fragmentation : fragmented frames have no
flow information (but the first fragment)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 17:46 [PATCH] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet overflow Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-19 17:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-22 20:40   ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-22 20:46     ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-22 22:30       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-23 18:45         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 18:46           ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 19:18             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-23 20:30               ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 20:31                 ` [PATCH net-next v4] " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 21:23                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-23 21:37                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 21:37                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-23 21:52                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-23 22:34                         ` David Miller
2013-04-24  0:09                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24  0:37                           ` [PATCH net-next v5] " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-24  1:07                             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25  8:20                             ` David Miller
2013-05-20 14:02                               ` [PATCH net-next v6] " Willem de Bruijn
2013-05-20 16:00                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-20 16:08                                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-05-20 20:48                                   ` David Miller
2013-04-24  1:25                           ` [PATCH net-next v4] " Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-24  1:32                             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24  1:44                               ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-24  2:11                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24 13:00                                   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-24 14:41                                     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-04-23 22:33                     ` David Miller
2013-04-23 21:34                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-23 22:41                   ` David Miller
2013-04-23 23:11                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-23 23:15                       ` David Miller
2013-04-23 23:26                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-24  0:03                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-24  0:00                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 20:46                 ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 19:03 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-19 19:21   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-19 20:11   ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1366814464.8964.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox