netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@freescale.com,
	shawn.guo@linaro.org, festevam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] URGENT for 3.9: net: fec: revert NAPI introduction
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366893854.4139.17.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130419.133825.1727571575417364801.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David,

Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 13:38 -0400 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:36:01 +0200
> 
> > As it's way too late in the cycle to try and fix this up just revert the
> > relevant patches for now.
> 
> I disagree, fix this properly, the revert is more intrusive.

In the last days I've tried to fix the failures I'm seeing with adding
back the locks and disabling NAPI while restarting the controller. Both
approaches are neither minimally intrusive, nor do they fix all the
failures. I suspect there is a subtler error in some of the changed ring
buffer handling code also, but I wasn't able to track this down further
to a specific single-line change.

The only way to reliably fix all the failures I'm seeing is really
reverting the changes, as done with this series. So David please
consider taking the reverts, even while they are a bit intrusive, they
are the only way to get a 3.9 release out of the door with a working FEC
driver.

Regards,
Lucas
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Lucas Stach                 |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-25 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 14:36 [PATCH 0/3] URGENT for 3.9: net: fec: revert NAPI introduction Lucas Stach
2013-04-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "net: fec: fix missing napi_disable call" Lucas Stach
2013-04-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "net: fec: put tx to napi poll function to fix dead lock" Lucas Stach
2013-04-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] Revert "net: fec: add napi support to improve proformance" Lucas Stach
2013-04-19 17:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] URGENT for 3.9: net: fec: revert NAPI introduction David Miller
2013-04-25 12:44   ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2013-04-25 19:14     ` David Miller
2013-04-19 18:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-19 18:26   ` David Miller
2013-04-19 20:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-20 12:35   ` Frank Li
2013-04-22  8:56     ` Lucas Stach
2013-04-22  9:17       ` Frank Li
2013-04-25 12:31         ` Lucas Stach
2013-04-25 14:45           ` Frank Li
2013-04-25 14:57             ` Lucas Stach
2013-04-27  7:12               ` Frank Li
2013-04-25 12:37   ` Lucas Stach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1366893854.4139.17.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Frank.Li@freescale.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).