From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 4/4] net: frag LRU list per CPU Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:15:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1366917347.26911.624.camel@localhost> References: <20130424154624.16883.40974.stgit@dragon> <20130424154848.16883.65833.stgit@dragon> <1366849557.8964.110.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1366898369.26911.604.camel@localhost> <1366899530.8964.150.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Hannes Frederic Sowa , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58444 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755613Ab3DYTPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:15:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1366899530.8964.150.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 07:18 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Let be clear : [cut Q&A worklist] Thanks, that is perfect. I'll start working on it Monday (as tomorrow is a public holiday, and my home gets invaded by family, who will be sleeping in my office). One more question: > Q) You want performance and big number of frags to cope with attacks > A) resize the hash table when the admin sets a bigger limit Q) How do we solve the per netns limit vs hash size? (Make limit global?) --Jesper