From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] filter: refactor BPF JIT for seccomp filters
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:51:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366962706-24204-2-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366962706-24204-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com>
Currently, bpf_jit_compile() and bpf_jit_free() takes an sk_filter,
which seccomp filters cannot reuse.
Change bpf_jit_compile() to take a pointer to BPF instructions and
the length, and to return a JITted function.
Change bpf_jit_free() to take a JITted function.
Add JIT calls for seccomp filters.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/filter.h | 16 ++++++++++------
kernel/seccomp.c | 6 +++++-
net/core/filter.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index d1248f4..8743093 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -21,12 +21,14 @@ struct compat_sock_fprog {
struct sk_buff;
struct sock;
+typedef unsigned int (*bpf_func_t)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
+ const struct sock_filter *filter);
+
struct sk_filter
{
atomic_t refcnt;
unsigned int len; /* Number of filter blocks */
- unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct sock_filter *filter);
+ bpf_func_t bpf_func;
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct sock_filter insns[0];
};
@@ -48,11 +50,12 @@ extern int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
extern int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *filter, unsigned len);
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
+#include <stdarg.h>
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
-extern void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp);
-extern void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp);
+extern bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
+extern void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func);
static inline void bpf_jit_dump(unsigned int flen, unsigned int proglen,
u32 pass, void *image)
@@ -65,10 +68,11 @@ static inline void bpf_jit_dump(unsigned int flen, unsigned int proglen,
}
#define SK_RUN_FILTER(FILTER, SKB) (*FILTER->bpf_func)(SKB, FILTER->insns)
#else
-static inline void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
+static inline bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
{
+ return sk_run_filter;
}
-static inline void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp)
+static inline void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func)
{
}
#define SK_RUN_FILTER(FILTER, SKB) sk_run_filter(SKB, FILTER->insns)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 5af44b5..f784feb 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter {
atomic_t usage;
struct seccomp_filter *prev;
unsigned short len; /* Instruction count */
+ bpf_func_t bpf_func;
struct sock_filter insns[];
};
@@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(int syscall)
* value always takes priority (ignoring the DATA).
*/
for (f = current->seccomp.filter; f; f = f->prev) {
- u32 cur_ret = sk_run_filter(NULL, f->insns);
+ u32 cur_ret = SK_RUN_FILTER(f, NULL);
if ((cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) < (ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION))
ret = cur_ret;
}
@@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog)
if (ret)
goto fail;
+ filter->bpf_func = bpf_jit_compile(filter->insns, filter->len);
+
/*
* If there is an existing filter, make it the prev and don't drop its
* task reference.
@@ -330,6 +333,7 @@ void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
while (orig && atomic_dec_and_test(&orig->usage)) {
struct seccomp_filter *freeme = orig;
orig = orig->prev;
+ bpf_jit_free(freeme->bpf_func);
kfree(freeme);
}
}
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index dad2a17..0a7900b 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ void sk_filter_release_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct sk_filter *fp = container_of(rcu, struct sk_filter, rcu);
- bpf_jit_free(fp);
+ bpf_jit_free(fp->bpf_func);
kfree(fp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_filter_release_rcu);
@@ -652,13 +652,11 @@ static int __sk_prepare_filter(struct sk_filter *fp)
{
int err;
- fp->bpf_func = sk_run_filter;
-
err = sk_chk_filter(fp->insns, fp->len);
if (err)
return err;
- bpf_jit_compile(fp);
+ fp->bpf_func = bpf_jit_compile(fp->insns, fp->len);
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-26 7:51 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT Xi Wang
2013-04-26 7:51 ` Xi Wang [this message]
2013-04-26 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] filter: refactor BPF JIT for seccomp filters Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction Xi Wang
2013-04-26 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 14:50 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:29 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 15:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:57 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 18:48 ` David Miller
2013-04-26 16:02 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 18:25 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 18:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:15 ` David Laight
2013-04-26 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 15:38 ` David Laight
2013-04-26 15:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-26 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] PPC: net: bpf_jit_comp: refactor the BPF JIT interface Xi Wang
2013-04-26 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] sparc: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26 7:51 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] s390/bpf,jit: " Xi Wang
2013-04-26 11:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT Heiko Carstens
2013-04-26 11:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2013-04-26 12:15 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 11:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-26 12:31 ` Xi Wang
2013-04-26 12:38 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-29 12:18 ` Nicolas Schichan
2013-04-29 13:21 ` Nicolas Schichan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366962706-24204-2-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com \
--to=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).