From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:40:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1367001606.8964.246.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1366962706-24204-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <1366962706-24204-3-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <1366985926.8964.190.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1366989094.8964.212.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1366992840.8964.239.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Russell King , Heiko Carstens , Eric Dumazet , Will Drewry , Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Xi Wang Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 14:25 -0400, Xi Wang wrote: > Not sure how many you are speaking for when you say "We are very dumb". :) > > Thanks for catching this. I'l remove this arch thing in v2. > > To address your other concern about registers, I'll add some comments > to the code, something like: > > "%rdi,%r8,%r9 are not used by seccomp filters; it's safe to not save them." OK good BTW, most of us prefer Bottom posting on lkml/netdev http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting Thanks