From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v7 4/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:38:14 +0800 Message-ID: <1367314694.3216.25.camel@cr0> References: <1367311395-15891-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1367311395-15891-5-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <87r4hscr7s.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens , Stephen Hemminger , "David S. Miller" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63455 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759173Ab3D3Jjg (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:39:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r4hscr7s.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:17 +0200, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > There is no need to rush > this, and people may get tired of looking at the same shortcomings > over > and over again.=20 The sooner it gets merged, the less maintaining pains I have. I have to solve many conflicts _every time_ I rebase it on to the latest net-next= =2E What's more, I _do_ have some specific reason to push it soon. Please don't judge it by your own standard, you are not the one who is being pushed. At last, you can just read the changelog in the cover letter, don't hav= e to look at them over and over again at all.