From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: add device IDs for Dell 5804 (Novatel E371) WWAN card Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:24:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1367439868.12353.22.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> References: <1367431305.12353.8.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <87r4hqbleh.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1367438620.12353.11.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <87mwsebghb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Network Development , Greg KH , stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Urlichs To: dag dg Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 15:20 -0500, dag dg wrote: > Vendor ID is 413c Product ID is 819b Bjorn meant the actual Novatel E371 device IDs... Dan >=20 > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote= : >=20 > > Dan Williams writes: > > > > > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:33 +0200, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > > >> Dan Williams writes: > > >> > > >> > A rebranded Novatel E371 for AT&T's LTE bands. > > >> > > >> I don't think we're handling the Novatel branded E371 yet? I tr= ied > > >> googling for ID of that, but were unable to find it. I guess yo= u don't > > >> know either... Well, nothing we can do about that until someone= reports > > >> it. > > > > > > See the referenced bug report which prompted this: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D955426 > > > > > > It's definitely QMI capable. > > > > Yes, absolutely. > > > > I just assumed the E371 exists with a Novatel vendor ID as well. Wh= ich > > we could and should also add, if we only knew what the product ID i= s. > > > > But it wasn't my intention to question the addition of the Dell > > rebranded E371. There's absolutely no need to let that wait. Sorry = for > > being unclear. I am not communicating well today... > > > > > > > > > > Bj=C3=B8rn > > > >