From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bjorn@mork.no, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dlstevens@us.ibm.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v7 4/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 15:55:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367481337.2415.21.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130430.150547.2297961494334074636.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 15:05 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> Your patch has had large, major, shortcomings every single iteration.
This is due to people including you only point out one problem per
iteration, for some reason I don't understand...
For example, you pointed out IPv6=M issue in v5, and then pointed out
disable_ipv6 issue in v6. Until you pointed them out, I even wasn't
aware of them. All the problems I have fixed, except the naming of
struct fields which I still don't agree, exist in v1, there is no
regression since v1.
As always, it is _highly_ appreciated if all of you can point as many
issues as you can in a single iteration, so that I can fix them all in
one update (if I can fix), this also saves me _a lot_ of time,
obviously.
So, I even don't understand what you are complaining about. :) I am
trying my best to address all the issues you pointed out including the
one that I don't agree at all, except the one I can't fix right now
(scope id). If anything I can improve on my side, please explicitly let
me know.
Again, I am _not_ an IPv6 expert, I am sure there are still some other
issues like disable_ipv6 that I am still not aware of, so please don't
expect me to be able to fix all bugs alone at one time, I am trying to
fix them one by one, and this is the best that I can do.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 8:43 [Patch net-next v7 0/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support Cong Wang
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 1/6] vxlan: defer vxlan init as late as possible Cong Wang
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 2/6] ipv6: export a stub for ipv6_sock_mc_join and ipv6_sock_mc_drop Cong Wang
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 3/6] ipv6: export in6addr_loopback to modules Cong Wang
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 4/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support Cong Wang
2013-04-30 9:17 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-04-30 9:25 ` Cong Wang
2013-04-30 10:33 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-04-30 19:06 ` David Miller
2013-05-02 8:05 ` Cong Wang
2013-05-02 8:10 ` David Miller
2013-05-02 12:45 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-05-03 3:02 ` Cong Wang
2013-04-30 19:05 ` David Miller
2013-05-02 7:55 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-04-30 9:38 ` Cong Wang
2013-04-30 18:58 ` David Miller
2013-04-30 19:04 ` David Miller
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 5/6] vxlan: respect disable_ipv6 sysctl Cong Wang
2013-04-30 12:27 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-30 8:43 ` [Patch net-next v7 6/6] ipv6: Add generic UDP Tunnel segmentation Cong Wang
2013-04-30 19:00 ` [Patch net-next v7 0/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support David Miller
2013-05-02 7:02 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367481337.2415.21.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox