From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v7 4/6] vxlan: add ipv6 support Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 11:02:11 +0800 Message-ID: <1367550131.2415.48.camel@cr0> References: <1367311395-15891-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1367311395-15891-5-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <87r4hscr7s.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1367313956.3216.18.camel@cr0> <87mwsgcnoy.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1367481953.2415.29.camel@cr0> <87sj25a6tr.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens , Stephen Hemminger , "David S. Miller" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27290 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757783Ab3ECDC2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2013 23:02:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sj25a6tr.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:45 +0200, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > Yes, I am pretty sure of that as well. That's why I ask you to *test= * > your code with assorted settings before resubmitting it. I'm not > going > to.=20 I have two scripts to test my patch, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6. Bot= h use the default configuration on Fedora. That is chicken-and-egg problem, if I wasn't aware of such sysctl's, ho= w possible could I test it with different settings? Please don't doubt I have tested it as much as I can, I just didn't know some IPv6 specific sysctl's exist.