From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: 3.6-rt: inet_sk_rx_dst_set() network splat Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 07:03:07 -0700 Message-ID: <1367589787.29805.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1366786204.5977.10.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1366853695.8964.120.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1366865490.4595.22.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1366866233.8964.128.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130426105030.GE20927@linutronix.de> <1367455779.30667.113.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130503082058.GA8230@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steven Rostedt , Mike Galbraith , David Miller , RT , netdev To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:39686 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932433Ab3ECODU (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 10:03:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130503082058.GA8230@linutronix.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:20 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Steven Rostedt | 2013-05-01 20:49:39 [-0400]: > > >Is this something going into the stable tree, or does it not affect 3.0, > >3.2, 3.4 or 3.6? > > Mike Galbraith reported it against v3.6 so I would say that this is one > candidate. I just booted v3.4.41-rt55 and it runs for 20 minutes now > without any issues. Maybe it crashes after I sent the email but I hope > it does not :) Thats because the particular way to trigger the bug was to use the IP early demux, and it was added in 3.5