From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] filter: do not output bpf image address for security reason Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 19:55:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1368845756.3301.145.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1368833499.3301.126.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1368839478.3469.70.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev , Daniel Borkmann To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]:34902 "EHLO mail-pb0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757328Ab3ERCz6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2013 22:55:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro8so3819835pbb.41 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 19:55:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1368839478.3469.70.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 02:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Not "%pK"? > Yes, thanks for the suggestion.