From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
708995@bugs.debian.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: Bug#708995: iptables firewall is dropping GRO'd packets
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:03:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369101790.3301.206.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369097605.3301.203.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 01:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
> > kicks in on the LAN interface.
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 05:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The Windows system is connected to the LAN interface (int0). Turning
> > > off GRO on this interface works around the problem. But since GRO is
> > > on by default, it clearly ought to work properly with iptables.
> > >
> > > I'll try to work out where the drops are occurring, but the
> > > perf net_dropmonitor script is also broken...
> > [...]
> >
> > I've fixed that script and now I can see that it's not iptables but
> > tbf_enqueue() that is dropping the GRO'd packets. I do traffic-shaping
> > on the PPP link like this:
> >
> > tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 root tbf rate 420kbit latency 50ms burst 1540
> >
> > The local TCP will never generate an skb larger than the burst size
> > because it knows the PPP interface can't do GSO or TSO. And the wifi
> > network doesn't seem to be fast enough for GRO to have much of an
> > effect. But a peer on the wired network can trigger GRO and this
> > produces an skb that exceeds the burst size.
> >
> > Is this a bug in sch_tbf, or should I accept it as a limitation? It
> > seems like it should do GSO on entry to the queue if necessary.
> >
>
> This has been discussed on netdev this year.
>
> Jiri Pirko was working on this.
>
> (thread : tbf: take into account gso skbs)
I have tested the following (net-next) patch
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
index c8388f3..a132620 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
@@ -116,14 +116,50 @@ struct tbf_sched_data {
struct qdisc_watchdog watchdog; /* Watchdog timer */
};
+
+static int tbf_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch, struct Qdisc *child)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *segs, *nskb;
+ netdev_features_t features = netif_skb_features(skb);
+ int ret, nb;
+
+ segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(segs))
+ return qdisc_reshape_fail(skb, sch);
+
+ nb = 0;
+ while (segs) {
+ nskb = segs->next;
+ segs->next = NULL;
+ qdisc_skb_cb(segs)->pkt_len = segs->len;
+
+ ret = qdisc_enqueue(segs, child);
+ if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
+ if (net_xmit_drop_count(ret))
+ sch->qstats.drops++;
+ } else {
+ nb++;
+ }
+ segs = nskb;
+ }
+ sch->q.qlen += nb;
+ if (nb > 1)
+ qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1 - nb);
+ consume_skb(skb);
+ return nb > 0 ? NET_XMIT_SUCCESS : NET_XMIT_DROP;
+}
+
static int tbf_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
{
struct tbf_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
int ret;
- if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) > q->max_size)
+ if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) > q->max_size) {
+ if (skb_is_gso(skb))
+ return tbf_segment(skb, sch, q->qdisc);
return qdisc_reshape_fail(skb, sch);
-
+ }
ret = qdisc_enqueue(skb, q->qdisc);
if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
if (net_xmit_drop_count(ret))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130520044850.31127.24148.reportbug@shadbolt.decadent.org.uk>
2013-05-21 0:28 ` Bug#708995: iptables firewall is dropping GRO'd packets Ben Hutchings
2013-05-21 0:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 2:03 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-05-21 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-05-21 13:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 18:16 ` [PATCH net-next] sch_tbf: segment too big GSO packets Eric Dumazet
2013-05-21 20:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-05-23 7:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369101790.3301.206.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=708995@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox