From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Bug#708995: iptables firewall is dropping GRO'd packets Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 06:22:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1369142526.3301.208.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130520044850.31127.24148.reportbug@shadbolt.decadent.org.uk> <1369096123.3469.127.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1369097605.3301.203.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1369101790.3301.206.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130521125502.GA7374@minipsycho.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Hutchings , netdev , 708995@bugs.debian.org To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:44149 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753196Ab3EUNWI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:22:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kl13so708594pab.20 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 06:22:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130521125502.GA7374@minipsycho.brq.redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:55 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > This is looking good to me. On my test machine it makes tbf work correctly > with gso packets. > I worked on similar patch (enqueue path) myself some time ago but I got > distracted by other tasks. Yes, I understood this. > > Do you plan to submit this patch? > Of course I will, when correctly tested.