From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] xen-netback: immediately wake tx queue when guest rx queue has space
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:56:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <136ea81c65e847719c787c37679f8da3@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161004124854.GD30836@localhost.localdomain>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@oracle.com]
> Sent: 04 October 2016 13:49
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu
> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] xen-netback: immediately
> wake tx queue when guest rx queue has space
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:29:15AM -0700, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> >
> > When an skb is removed from the guest rx queue, immediately wake the
> > tx queue, instead of after processing them.
>
> Please, could the description explain why?
>
Is it not reasonably obvious that it improves parallelism between filling and draining the queue? I could add a comment if you think it needs spelling out.
Paul
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> [re-based]
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c
> > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c index b0ce4c6..9548709 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c
> > @@ -92,27 +92,21 @@ static struct sk_buff *xenvif_rx_dequeue(struct
> xenvif_queue *queue)
> > spin_lock_irq(&queue->rx_queue.lock);
> >
> > skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue->rx_queue);
> > - if (skb)
> > + if (skb) {
> > queue->rx_queue_len -= skb->len;
> > + if (queue->rx_queue_len < queue->rx_queue_max) {
> > + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> > +
> > + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(queue->vif->dev,
> queue->id);
> > + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > spin_unlock_irq(&queue->rx_queue.lock);
> >
> > return skb;
> > }
> >
> > -static void xenvif_rx_queue_maybe_wake(struct xenvif_queue *queue) -
> {
> > - spin_lock_irq(&queue->rx_queue.lock);
> > -
> > - if (queue->rx_queue_len < queue->rx_queue_max) {
> > - struct net_device *dev = queue->vif->dev;
> > -
> > - netif_tx_wake_queue(netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, queue-
> >id));
> > - }
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&queue->rx_queue.lock);
> > -}
> > -
> > static void xenvif_rx_queue_purge(struct xenvif_queue *queue) {
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > @@ -585,8 +579,6 @@ int xenvif_kthread_guest_rx(void *data)
> > */
> > xenvif_rx_queue_drop_expired(queue);
> >
> > - xenvif_rx_queue_maybe_wake(queue);
> > -
> > cond_resched();
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-04 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 9:29 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] xen-netback: guest rx side refactor Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] xen-netback: separate guest side rx code into separate module Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] xen-netback: retire guest rx side prefix GSO feature Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 10:14 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-10-04 12:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-04 13:35 ` Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 14:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-05 15:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-10-05 15:40 ` Manuel Bouyer
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/7] xen-netback: refactor guest rx Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] xen-netback: immediately wake tx queue when guest rx queue has space Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 12:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-04 13:56 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/7] xen-netback: process guest rx packets in batches Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 12:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-04 14:02 ` Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 14:51 ` David Vrabel
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] xen-netback: batch copies for multiple to-guest rx packets Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/7] xen/netback: add fraglist support for to-guest rx Paul Durrant
2016-10-04 10:56 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-10-07 0:38 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] xen-netback: guest rx side refactor David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=136ea81c65e847719c787c37679f8da3@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).