From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] htb: report overhead attribute Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:56:02 -0700 Message-ID: <1370274962.24311.156.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130529151330.22c5c89e@redhat.com> <1370207755.24311.81.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1370208781.24311.89.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51ACB9FE.1020100@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Stephen Hemminger , netdev To: Rick Jones Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:56487 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758763Ab3FCP4G (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:56:06 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wp1so954530pac.31 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51ACB9FE.1020100@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 08:45 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > Is it (still) possible to have a negative overhead? > > http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/speedmod-with-tc-atm-qos-patch-for-adsl.31541/ overhead always has been unsigned in the kernel. What you describe is a userland hack in tc command. (or a bug)