From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Don, Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
HPA <hpa@zytor.com>, Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@tamir.org.il>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@broadcom.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 net-next 5/7] net: simple poll/select low latency socket poll
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:20:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370445606.24311.265.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF401C.2030506@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:41 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 16:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I am a bit uneasy with this one, because an applicatio polling() on one
> > thousand file descriptors using select()/poll(), will call sk_poll_ll()
> > one thousand times.
>
> But we call sk_poll_ll() with nonblock set, so it will only test once
> for each socket and not loop.
>
> I think this is not as bad as it sounds.
> We still honor the time limit on how long to poll.
We still call ndo_ll_poll() a thousand times, and probably do a
spinlock/unlock a thousand times in the driver.
I would definitely be convinced if you give us some performance numbers
of a poll() on a thousand tcp sockets for example.
See my following mail about sk_poll_ll()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 10:34 [PATCH v9 net-next 0/7] net: low latency Ethernet device polling Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 10:34 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 1/7] net: add napi_id and hash Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 10:34 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 2/7] net: add low latency socket poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 15:28 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-06-05 15:31 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 15:30 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 15:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 15:46 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 12:50 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 10:34 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 3/7] udp: add low latency socket poll support Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 10:34 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 4/7] tcp: " Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 10:34 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 5/7] net: simple poll/select low latency socket poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 13:41 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 14:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 14:56 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 15:20 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-06-05 15:47 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 13:49 ` David Laight
2013-06-05 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-05 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 6/7] ixgbe: add support for ndo_ll_poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-05 10:35 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 7/7] ixgbe: add extra stats " Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-07 21:48 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 0/7] net: low latency Ethernet device polling David Miller
2013-06-08 18:06 ` Eliezer Tamir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1370445606.24311.265.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eliezer@tamir.org.il \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox