From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: add 64bit rate estimators Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:37:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1370461057.24311.296.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1370408447.24311.241.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1370458531.1918.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]:44408 "EHLO mail-oa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755354Ab3FEThj (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:37:39 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f4so1485197oah.38 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:37:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1370458531.1918.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 19:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet > > > > struct gnet_stats_rate_est contains u32 fields, so the byte per second > > field can wrap at 34360Mbit. > > > > Add a new gnet_stats_rate_est64 structure to get 64bit bps field, and > > switch the kernel to use this structure natively. > [...] > > /** > > + * struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 - rate estimator > > + * @bps: current byte rate > > + * @pps: current packet rate > > + */ > > +struct gnet_stats_rate_est64 { > > + __u64 bps; > > + __u32 pps; > > +} __attribute__ ((packed)); > [...] > > Using attribute packed (which should be written as __packed) forces the > alignment of each member and the structure as a whole to be 1. For an > architecture where unaligned access is expensive, gcc will make all > reads and writes use byte operations. > > I think you have to add a dummy __u32 member instead. Its exported to userland so __packed is not available. Or has this been changed lately ? This structure is only used in very slow path, in the rate estimator thing, so the unaligned accesses are not a problem at all. I made this choice to not increase sizeof(struct Qdisc) and the alignments as well. If you think there is an issue with userland, we could use a gnet_stats_rate_est64_packed in kernel, and a gnet_stats_rate_est64 in userland.