From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch net-next v5 1/3] igmp: make some functions void
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:41:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371282069-26893-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
ip_mc_leave_src() can become void, because even if it fails,
the operations after it can still continue.
ip_mc_del_src() can become void, because no one cares and
some callers ignore it on purpose.
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
change since v4: fix a typo in changelog
net/ipv4/igmp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index cd71190..1a6a626 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1571,15 +1571,15 @@ static int ip_mc_del1_src(struct ip_mc_list *pmc, int sfmode,
#define igmp_ifc_event(x) do { } while (0)
#endif
-static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
- int sfcount, __be32 *psfsrc, int delta)
+static void ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
+ int sfcount, __be32 *psfsrc, int delta)
{
struct ip_mc_list *pmc;
int changerec = 0;
- int i, err;
+ int i;
if (!in_dev)
- return -ENODEV;
+ return;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_pmc_rcu(in_dev, pmc) {
if (*pmca == pmc->multiaddr)
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
if (!pmc) {
/* MCA not found?? bug */
rcu_read_unlock();
- return -ESRCH;
+ return;
}
spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1596,18 +1596,14 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
sf_markstate(pmc);
#endif
if (!delta) {
- err = -EINVAL;
if (!pmc->sfcount[sfmode])
goto out_unlock;
pmc->sfcount[sfmode]--;
}
- err = 0;
for (i=0; i<sfcount; i++) {
int rv = ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[i]);
changerec |= rv > 0;
- if (!err && rv < 0)
- err = rv;
}
if (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_EXCLUDE &&
pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] == 0 &&
@@ -1631,7 +1627,6 @@ static int ip_mc_del_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_bh(&pmc->lock);
- return err;
}
/*
@@ -1783,7 +1778,7 @@ static int ip_mc_add_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode,
if (!delta)
pmc->sfcount[sfmode]--;
for (j=0; j<i; j++)
- (void) ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
+ ip_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
} else if (isexclude != (pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] != 0)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
struct ip_sf_list *psf;
@@ -1887,24 +1882,23 @@ done:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_mc_join_group);
-static int ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
- struct in_device *in_dev)
+static void ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
+ struct in_device *in_dev)
{
struct ip_sf_socklist *psf = rtnl_dereference(iml->sflist);
- int err;
if (psf == NULL) {
/* any-source empty exclude case */
- return ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ return;
}
- err = ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr,
iml->sfmode, psf->sl_count, psf->sl_addr, 0);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(iml->sflist, NULL);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psf->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psf, rcu);
- return err;
}
/*
@@ -1937,7 +1931,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
iml->multi.imr_address.s_addr)
continue;
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
*imlp = iml->next_rcu;
@@ -1949,6 +1943,7 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
kfree_rcu(iml, rcu);
return 0;
}
+
if (!in_dev)
ret = -ENODEV;
rtnl_unlock();
@@ -2085,7 +2080,7 @@ int ip_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk, struct
err = 0;
/* update the interface list */
ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &mreqs->imr_multiaddr, omode, 1,
- &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
+ &mreqs->imr_sourceaddr, 1);
done:
rtnl_unlock();
if (leavegroup)
@@ -2156,19 +2151,19 @@ int ip_mc_msfilter(struct sock *sk, struct ip_msfilter *msf, int ifindex)
}
} else {
newpsl = NULL;
- (void) ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
- msf->imsf_fmode, 0, NULL, 0);
+ ip_mc_add_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr,
+ msf->imsf_fmode, 0, NULL, 0);
}
psl = rtnl_dereference(pmc->sflist);
if (psl) {
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
- psl->sl_count, psl->sl_addr, 0);
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ psl->sl_count, psl->sl_addr, 0);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
atomic_sub(IP_SFLSIZE(psl->sl_max), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
kfree_rcu(psl, rcu);
} else
- (void) ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
- 0, NULL, 0);
+ ip_mc_del_src(in_dev, &msf->imsf_multiaddr, pmc->sfmode,
+ 0, NULL, 0);
rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->sflist, newpsl);
pmc->sfmode = msf->imsf_fmode;
err = 0;
@@ -2357,7 +2352,7 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
inet->mc_list = iml->next_rcu;
in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, iml->multi.imr_ifindex);
- (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
+ ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
if (in_dev != NULL)
ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr);
/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-15 7:41 Cong Wang [this message]
2013-06-15 7:41 ` [Patch net-next v5 2/3] ipv6,mcast: make some functions void Cong Wang
2013-06-15 7:41 ` [Patch net-next v5 3/3] igmp: convert RTNL lock to a spinlock Cong Wang
2013-06-15 7:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-15 8:12 ` Cong Wang
2013-06-15 8:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-15 8:44 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1371282069-26893-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).