From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:00:29 +0800 Message-ID: <1372662029.2974.16.camel@cr0> References: <1372315398-19683-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1372315398-19683-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1372353355.2060.22.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Rob Landley , Neil Horman , Jiri Pirko , Veaceslav Falico , Ding@jasper.es To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51610 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388Ab3GAHBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 03:01:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1372353355.2060.22.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang > > Hi Cong. > > I think this is premature. > > Please let the discussion and implementation > for %pI[gS] play out and be accepted > into next before using it in other subsystems. > > Yeah, I already talked with Daniel off-list, and I agree his %pIS patch should go first. (Also I apologized to him for forgetting to credit him when I submitted this patchset.)