From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: 3.9.5+: Crash in tcp_input.c:4810. Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:02:29 -0700 Message-ID: <1372827749.4979.52.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <51BF50B3.1080403@candelatech.com> <1371493059.3252.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51D1C620.8030007@candelatech.com> <1372813467.4979.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51D398C0.5060802@candelatech.com> <1372826512.4979.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51D3AD66.8030506@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev To: Ben Greear Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:56708 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830Ab3GCFCa (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 01:02:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so4254864pdj.17 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:02:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51D3AD66.8030506@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 21:49 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Well, network emulators are easy to come by in the office.... Maybe running > a bunch of TCP connections through a lossy network would exercise this code > path a bit? Aside from random pkt loss, any other types of network conditions > that might help trigger this faster? > > I'll set up some tests using some wired ethernet...if we can trigger it there > then we at least know it doesn't depend on ath9k... I tried a lot of things, including netem with many reorders and/or packetdrill tests, but so far not a single warning from tcp_collapse()