From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [RFC] tulip: Support for byte queue limits Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:27:17 -0700 Message-ID: <1373938037.10804.82.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130712180116.21176.qmail@science.horizon.com> <1373932689.3745.30.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Hutchings , George Spelvin , Grant Grundler , "open list:TULIP NETWORK DRI..." To: Grant Grundler Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:45283 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754606Ab3GPB1U (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:27:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id xk17so114616obc.24 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:27:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 18:17 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > Even for tulip driver? Sorry, I just can't imagine anyone taking > enough interest in tulip driver to implement that. I'm not even sure > it would be possible. > I would not care. When I reviewed this patch, I was aware of this problem (as this is the most common error done in BQL patches), and decided patch was fine, because lock was held.