From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ? Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:56:48 -0700 Message-ID: <1374076608.1949.89.camel@joe-AO722> References: <20130716025954.GC26761@windriver.com> <1374006725.12825.112.camel@envy.home> <51E6B5BE.6050505@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Darren Hart , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:45002 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754176Ab3GQP4u (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:56:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51E6B5BE.6050505@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:18 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Do we really need different coding styles for different sub directories > > of the same source tree? I won't say anything more on this or try to > > argue the point, it isn't my call. Just seems.... strange to me. > > It is what it is; I'm just documenting it here. Not that duplication is bad, but that comment style variation is documented in CodingStyle.