From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip: initialize hash list Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:06:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1374505616.2061.40.camel@joe-AO722> References: <20130720102657.768a11ea@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1374342380.1940.2.camel@joe-AO722> <20130722075245.70310bfa@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pravin B Shelar , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:41681 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757084Ab3GVPG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130722075245.70310bfa@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 07:52 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:46:20 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: [] > > Are you doing to do just this one or submit a series? > > Hadn't planned on fixing more than one. And would not go outside code > that I actually use. What a pity. I think if you identify what you believe is a trivial defect in your own code, it's both polite and social to fix similar defects in other code too.