public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] atl1c: Fix misuse of netdev_alloc_skb in refilling rx ring
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:59:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374969583.3669.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374960610.3607.13.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>

On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 22:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 20:30 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 01:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:47 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >> > atl1c uses netdev_alloc_skb to refill its rx dma ring, but that call makes no
> > >> > guarantees about the suitability of the memory for use in DMA.  As a result
> > >> > we've gotten reports of atl1c drivers occasionally hanging and needing to be
> > >> > reset:
> > >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54021
> > >> > 
> > >> > Fix this by modifying the call to use the internal version __netdev_alloc_skb,
> > >> > where you can set the gfp_mask explicitly to include GFP_DMA.
> > >> 
> > >> This is a really bad idea.  GFP_DMA means allocation from the ISA DMA
> > >> region (< 16 MB).  pci_map_single() takes care of allocating a bounce
> > >> buffer if necessary.
> [...]
> > Just to add a little bit more context (and hopefully not noise), I
> > started seeing this issue on 3.7.  Bisection resulted on the following
> > first bad commit:
> > 
> > 69b08f6 net: use bigger pages in __netdev_alloc_frag
> > 
> > Reverting this commit (and e5e6730 "skbuff: Move definition of
> > NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_SIZE") solved the problem.
> > 
> > Note also that I'm seeing this issue on a 32 bits system (64 bits
> > isn't supported).  This initially made me think the problem could be
> > related with this as 69b08f6 log explicitly refers to 32/64 bit
> > archs.  But I failed to find any obvious issue with the patch.
> 
> Then it seems like this patch works because passing the GFP_DMA flag to
> __netdev_alloc_skb() disables the use of __netdev_alloc_frag() and
> results in it calling __alloc_skb().  A better workaround would be for
> atl1c to call __alloc_skb() directly.
> 
> Perhaps the controller doesn't split RX DMA across PCIe page boundaries
> (4K), or some other boundaries at smaller intervals than
> NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_SIZE.
> 
> But I think that perhaps the use of __netdev_alloc_frag() should be made
> opt-in.  I doubt this is the only driver whose DMA requirements have
> been broken.  Since the Linux DMA API lacks any way for devices to
> specify boundaries which would then be observed by pci_map_single(), I
> don't think this can be considered simply a driver bug.

It is a driver bug to assume anything about alloc_skb(), as there is no
specification about skb->head being aligned to whatever boundary.

The only guarantee is the one provided by kmalloc(), that is 8 bytes.

I specifically asked this exact question in 

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54021#c19

And the Qualcom guys checked and said it was ok. Who should we trust ?

I hope you understand kmalloc(~2000 bytes) never made the assumption the
area fit a single page. SLOB or even SLUB/SLAB with some debugging
features...

If a hardware needs frame being in a single 4K page, its driver must do
its own allocation, or add appropriate aligning logic.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-27 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-26 16:47 [net PATCH] atl1c: Fix misuse of netdev_alloc_skb in refilling rx ring Neil Horman
2013-07-26 16:56 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-26 17:02   ` Neil Horman
2013-07-26 22:56     ` David Miller
2013-07-27 16:25       ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-27  0:02 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27  0:24   ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27 19:30     ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-27 19:49       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-27 21:30       ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27 23:59         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-07-28  3:02           ` David Miller
2013-07-28 10:44             ` Neil Horman
2013-07-28 16:15               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 18:53                 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-28 19:21                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 20:08                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 20:22                   ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-28 23:01                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:20                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:25                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:38                         ` Neil Horman
2013-07-29  0:07                         ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-29  0:21                           ` David Miller
2013-07-29  0:26                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29  9:55                         ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-29 10:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29 12:09                             ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-29 15:30                               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29 17:24                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-30  8:53                                   ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-31  2:11                                   ` David Miller
2013-07-31 17:48                                     ` Benjamin Poirier
2013-07-31 17:56                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-31 19:01                                       ` David Miller
2013-08-01  1:57                                         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1374969583.3669.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jcliburn@gmail.com \
    --cc=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox