From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] atl1c: Fix misuse of netdev_alloc_skb in refilling rx ring
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:59:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374969583.3669.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374960610.3607.13.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 22:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 20:30 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 01:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:47 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >> > atl1c uses netdev_alloc_skb to refill its rx dma ring, but that call makes no
> > >> > guarantees about the suitability of the memory for use in DMA. As a result
> > >> > we've gotten reports of atl1c drivers occasionally hanging and needing to be
> > >> > reset:
> > >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54021
> > >> >
> > >> > Fix this by modifying the call to use the internal version __netdev_alloc_skb,
> > >> > where you can set the gfp_mask explicitly to include GFP_DMA.
> > >>
> > >> This is a really bad idea. GFP_DMA means allocation from the ISA DMA
> > >> region (< 16 MB). pci_map_single() takes care of allocating a bounce
> > >> buffer if necessary.
> [...]
> > Just to add a little bit more context (and hopefully not noise), I
> > started seeing this issue on 3.7. Bisection resulted on the following
> > first bad commit:
> >
> > 69b08f6 net: use bigger pages in __netdev_alloc_frag
> >
> > Reverting this commit (and e5e6730 "skbuff: Move definition of
> > NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_SIZE") solved the problem.
> >
> > Note also that I'm seeing this issue on a 32 bits system (64 bits
> > isn't supported). This initially made me think the problem could be
> > related with this as 69b08f6 log explicitly refers to 32/64 bit
> > archs. But I failed to find any obvious issue with the patch.
>
> Then it seems like this patch works because passing the GFP_DMA flag to
> __netdev_alloc_skb() disables the use of __netdev_alloc_frag() and
> results in it calling __alloc_skb(). A better workaround would be for
> atl1c to call __alloc_skb() directly.
>
> Perhaps the controller doesn't split RX DMA across PCIe page boundaries
> (4K), or some other boundaries at smaller intervals than
> NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_SIZE.
>
> But I think that perhaps the use of __netdev_alloc_frag() should be made
> opt-in. I doubt this is the only driver whose DMA requirements have
> been broken. Since the Linux DMA API lacks any way for devices to
> specify boundaries which would then be observed by pci_map_single(), I
> don't think this can be considered simply a driver bug.
It is a driver bug to assume anything about alloc_skb(), as there is no
specification about skb->head being aligned to whatever boundary.
The only guarantee is the one provided by kmalloc(), that is 8 bytes.
I specifically asked this exact question in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54021#c19
And the Qualcom guys checked and said it was ok. Who should we trust ?
I hope you understand kmalloc(~2000 bytes) never made the assumption the
area fit a single page. SLOB or even SLUB/SLAB with some debugging
features...
If a hardware needs frame being in a single 4K page, its driver must do
its own allocation, or add appropriate aligning logic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 16:47 [net PATCH] atl1c: Fix misuse of netdev_alloc_skb in refilling rx ring Neil Horman
2013-07-26 16:56 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-26 17:02 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-26 22:56 ` David Miller
2013-07-27 16:25 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-27 0:02 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27 0:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27 19:30 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-27 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-27 21:30 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-27 23:59 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-07-28 3:02 ` David Miller
2013-07-28 10:44 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-28 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 18:53 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-28 19:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 20:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 20:22 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-28 23:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-28 23:38 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-29 0:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-29 0:21 ` David Miller
2013-07-29 0:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29 9:55 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-29 10:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29 12:09 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-29 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-29 17:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-30 8:53 ` Luis Henriques
2013-07-31 2:11 ` David Miller
2013-07-31 17:48 ` Benjamin Poirier
2013-07-31 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-31 19:01 ` David Miller
2013-08-01 1:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374969583.3669.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jcliburn@gmail.com \
--cc=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox