From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vfalico@redhat.com, fubar@us.ibm.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
ebiederm@xmission.com, joe@perches.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] fix bonding neighbour setup handling
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:07:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375463259-12033-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
Recent patches revealed an old bug, which was there for quite awhile. It's
related to vlan on top of bonding and ndo_neigh_setup(). When vlan device
is initiated, it calls its real_dev->ndo_neigh_setup(), and in case of
bonding - it will modify neigh_parms->neigh_setup to point to
bond_neigh_init, while neigh_parms are of vlan's dev.
This way, when neigh_parms->neigh_setup() of vlan's dev is called, the
bonding function will be called, which expects the dev to be struct
bonding, but will receive a vlan dev.
It was hidden before because of bond->first_slave usage. Now, with
Nikolay's conversion to list/RCU, first_slave is gone and we hit a null
pointer dereference when working with lists/slave.
First patch moves ndo_neigh_setup() in neigh_parms_alloc() to the bottom,
so that the ->dev will be available to the caller. It doesn't really change
anything, however is needed for the second patch.
Second patch makes bond_neigh_setup() (bond->ndo_neigh_setup()) check if
the neigh_parms are really from a bonding dev, and only modify the
neigh_setup in this case.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 +++++++-
net/core/neighbour.c | 10 ++++++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-02 17:07 Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-08-02 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] neighbour: populate neigh_parms on alloc before calling ndo_neigh_setup Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-02 17:07 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] bonding: modify only neigh_parms owned by us Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-02 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] fix bonding neighbour setup handling David Miller
2013-08-05 13:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-05 22:25 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375463259-12033-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).