public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	jon.maloy@ericsson.com, ying.xue@windriver.com
Subject: Re: skbs delivered to 'wrong' packet_type handler
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:55:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375883743.4004.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807130856.GI3165@eerihug-hybrid.rnd.ki.sw.ericsson.se>

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 15:08 +0200, Erik Hugne wrote:
> We have a race condition in TIPC when using both the parent ethernet 
> device, and a vlan on top of this device as TIPC bearers. For some reason, 
> net/core/dev.c is delivering vlan packets to packet handlers registered to 
> the native device. This only seems to occur when a packet_type handler is 
> registered on both the vlan device and it's parent ethernet device. This 
> causes all kinds of weird behaviour in TIPC, from cross-vlan links being 
> established to oopses.
> 
> At first, i thought this was due to a missing PACKET_OTHERHOST filtering
> in the TIPC ethernet code, but adding that check did not resolve the issue.
> Adding an explicit check for skb->dev vs packet_type->dev does work, but
> i dont think that's the proper way to solve it.
> What's the purpose of having a dev entry in the packet_type if it's ignored 
> by the lower layers?

Its not ignored, quite the contrary if you look at the code :

vi +3595 net/core/dev.c

        type = skb->protocol;
        list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype,
                        &ptype_base[ntohs(type) & PTYPE_HASH_MASK], list) {
                if (ptype->type == type &&
                    (ptype->dev == null_or_dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev ||
                     ptype->dev == orig_dev)) {
                        if (pt_prev)
                                ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
                        pt_prev = ptype;
                }
        }


pkt->dev being set is only meaningful for packet sockets.

Protocols themselves should not care. If they want to care, they must
add their own checks.

Socket API has SO_BINDTODEVICE for this purpose.
IP layer has RP filtering.

A protocol should register a single ptype with NULL dev.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-07 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07 13:08 skbs delivered to 'wrong' packet_type handler Erik Hugne
2013-08-07 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-08-07 15:57   ` Erik Hugne
2013-08-08  2:21     ` Ying Xue
2013-08-08  7:43       ` Erik Hugne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1375883743.4004.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=erik.hugne@ericsson.com \
    --cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox