From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] af_unix: improve STREAM behavior with fragmented memory Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:42:16 -0700 Message-ID: <1376232136.3291.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1375997852.4004.130.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130811140605.GA5666@order.stressinduktion.org> <1376231553.3291.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130811143715.GA3699@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , David Rientjes , netdev To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:40508 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753721Ab3HKOma (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:42:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y10so2367228pdj.8 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:42:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130811143715.GA3699@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 16:37 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 07:32:33AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 16:06 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > > > > I am sorry to report that I had to revert both these patches to have a working > > > systemd again. > > > > Hi Hannes > > > > If you revert only the second patch, the problem is still there, right ? > > Exactly, only reverting 2/2 did not help. I wonder if the consumed field (part of skb->cb{}) would not be zero ? I assumed it was. I have to check.