From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tmb@mageia.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
carlos@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net: sync some IP headers with glibc
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:48:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376534937.2626.6.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814.134246.1152657041177088716.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 13:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:37:33 +0800
>
> > @@ -23,31 +23,54 @@
> >
> > /* Standard well-defined IP protocols. */
> > enum {
> > - IPPROTO_IP = 0, /* Dummy protocol for TCP */
> > - IPPROTO_ICMP = 1, /* Internet Control Message Protocol */
>
> > + IPPROTO_IP = 0, /* Dummy protocol for TCP. */
>
> Please don't do unrelated things like reformat comments, it makes the
> path much harder to audit.
OK.
>
> > -
> > +#if __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR
> > struct in6_addr {
> > union {
> > __u8 u6_addr8[16];
> > +#if __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR
> > __be16 u6_addr16[8];
>
> The same CPP test twice inside of itself, the second test seems
> superfluous. I bet this second one was supposed to be
> __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR_ALT instead of __UAPI_DEF_IN6_ADDR.
Indeed.
>
> > -#define IPPROTO_HOPOPTS 0 /* IPv6 hop-by-hop options */
> > -#define IPPROTO_ROUTING 43 /* IPv6 routing header */
> > -#define IPPROTO_FRAGMENT 44 /* IPv6 fragmentation header */
> > -#define IPPROTO_ICMPV6 58 /* ICMPv6 */
> > -#define IPPROTO_NONE 59 /* IPv6 no next header */
> > -#define IPPROTO_DSTOPTS 60 /* IPv6 destination options */
> > -#define IPPROTO_MH 135 /* IPv6 mobility header */
> > +#if __UAPI_DEF_IPPROTO_V6
> > +enum {
> > + IPPROTO_HOPOPTS = 0, /* IPv6 hop-by-hop options */
>
> Again, do not reformat things, it's an unrelated change and makes
> this patch harder to review.
Ok.
I will update the patch.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 8:37 [Patch net-next] net: sync some IP headers with glibc Cong Wang
2013-08-13 8:37 ` [GLIBC Patch] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel Cong Wang
2013-08-14 20:42 ` [Patch net-next] net: sync some IP headers with glibc David Miller
2013-08-15 2:48 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-08-15 8:42 ` Cong Wang
2013-08-15 8:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376534937.2626.6.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmb@mageia.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).