From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: raise IP_MAX_MTU to theoretical limit
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:08:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376878087.4226.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
As discussed last year [1], there is no compelling reason
to limit IPv4 MTU to 0xFFF0, while real limit is 0xFFFF
[1] : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135607247609434&w=2
Willem raised this issue again because some of our internal
regression tests broke after lo mtu being set to 65536.
IP_MTU reports 0xFFF0, and the test attempts to send a RAW datagram of
mtu + 1 bytes, expecting the send() to fail, but it does not.
Alexey raised interesting points about TCP MSS, that should be addressed
in follow-up patches in TCP stack if needed, as someone could also set
an odd mtu anyway.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index e805481..727f436 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@
#define RT_FL_TOS(oldflp4) \
((oldflp4)->flowi4_tos & (IPTOS_RT_MASK | RTO_ONLINK))
-#define IP_MAX_MTU 0xFFF0
+/* IPv4 datagram length is stored into 16bit field (tot_len) */
+#define IP_MAX_MTU 0xFFFF
#define RT_GC_TIMEOUT (300*HZ)
@@ -1227,10 +1228,7 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_mtu(const struct dst_entry *dst)
mtu = 576;
}
- if (mtu > IP_MAX_MTU)
- mtu = IP_MAX_MTU;
-
- return mtu;
+ return min_t(unsigned int, mtu, IP_MAX_MTU);
}
static struct fib_nh_exception *find_exception(struct fib_nh *nh, __be32 daddr)
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 2:08 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: raise IP_MAX_MTU to theoretical limit David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376878087.4226.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox