* Re: Do you guys think add link test to offline test is reasonable?
[not found] <CAOhdcN_QPtfQK87LCmoS2k=7_W9Wzwke21PdvZUi9znZ3Si54Q@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2013-08-26 9:17 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2013-08-26 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hui-Zhi Zhao; +Cc: netdev
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 15:47 +0800, Hui-Zhi Zhao wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
> I have a query about the ethtool offline test.
>
>
> From the man page of "ethtool" I see the offline test should be
> "offline (default) means to perform full set of tests possibly causing
> normal operation interruption during the tests". In my opinion, it
> should just do something like inner loopback tests, offline should be
> no relative with live network connection.
I agree that an offline test should not depend on having a network link.
> Since it is impractical to expect these ports to be connected to a
> live network during production test (due to limited network
> resources, a machine maybe have lots of ports), some of the tests will
> fail, even the cards have no problem.
>
> So, do you guys think add link test to offline test is reasonable?
You can do it but it shouldn't affect the overall pass/fail result.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-08-26 9:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAOhdcN_QPtfQK87LCmoS2k=7_W9Wzwke21PdvZUi9znZ3Si54Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-26 9:17 ` Do you guys think add link test to offline test is reasonable? Ben Hutchings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).