From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 11/11] ipv6: Add generic UDP Tunnel segmentation Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:16:03 +0800 Message-ID: <1377850563.2591.11.camel@cr0> References: <1377667379-2315-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1377667379-2315-12-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , "David S. Miller" , Jesse Gross , Stephen Hemminger To: Pravin Shelar Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55993 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752529Ab3H3IQQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:16:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 10:55 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > > From: Cong Wang > > > > Similar to commit 731362674580cb0c696cd1b1a03d8461a10cf90a > > (tunneling: Add generic Tunnel segmentation) > > > Can we factor out ipv4-udp-tunnel code so that there is no duplicating code? Probably we can, but it will make code review harder? Or you mean doing it in a separated patch? If you insist, I can do it in a separated patch. Thanks.