From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, ncardwell@google.com, edumazet@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better comments for RTO initiallization
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:14:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378242875-5172-1-git-send-email-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
Commit 1b7fdd2ab585("tcp: do not use cached RTT for RTT estimation")
removes important comments on how RTO is initialized and updated.
Hopefully this patch puts those information back.
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
index 273ed73..4a22f3e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
@@ -481,13 +481,27 @@ void tcp_init_metrics(struct sock *sk)
crtt = tcp_metric_get_jiffies(tm, TCP_METRIC_RTT);
rcu_read_unlock();
reset:
+ /* The initial RTT measurement from the SYN/SYN-ACK is not ideal
+ * to seed the RTO for later data packets because SYN packets are
+ * small. Use the per-dst cached values to seed the RTO but keep
+ * the RTT estimator variables intact (e.g., srtt, mdev, rttvar).
+ * Later the RTO will be updated immediately upon obtaining the first
+ * data RTT sample (tcp_rtt_estimator()). Hence the cached RTT only
+ * influences the first RTO but not later RTT estimation.
+ *
+ * But if RTT is not available from the SYN (due to retransmits or
+ * syn cookies) or the cache, force a conservative 3secs timeout.
+ *
+ * A bit of theory. RTT is time passed after "normal" sized packet
+ * is sent until it is ACKed. In normal circumstances sending small
+ * packets force peer to delay ACKs and calculation is correct too.
+ * The algorithm is adaptive and, provided we follow specs, it
+ * NEVER underestimate RTT. BUT! If peer tries to make some clever
+ * tricks sort of "quick acks" for time long enough to decrease RTT
+ * to low value, and then abruptly stops to do it and starts to delay
+ * ACKs, wait for troubles.
+ */
if (crtt > tp->srtt) {
- /* Initial RTT (tp->srtt) from SYN usually don't measure
- * serialization delay on low BW links well so RTO may be
- * under-estimated. Stay conservative and seed RTO with
- * the RTTs from past data exchanges, using the same seeding
- * formula in tcp_rtt_estimator().
- */
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_rto = crtt + max(crtt >> 2, tcp_rto_min(sk));
} else if (tp->srtt == 0) {
/* RFC6298: 5.7 We've failed to get a valid RTT sample from
--
1.8.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 21:14 Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2013-09-03 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: better comments for RTO initiallization Neal Cardwell
2013-09-03 21:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 18:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378242875-5172-1-git-send-email-ycheng@google.com \
--to=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox