From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [patch] sfc: check for allocation failure Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 15:41:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1378305678.1556.2.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> References: <20130902082828.GA30037@elgon.mountain> <20130903.224939.866623192858217581.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , David Miller To: Return-path: Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:38527 "EHLO webmail.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934495Ab3IDOly (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:41:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130903.224939.866623192858217581.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 22:49 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Dan Carpenter > Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:04:42 +0300 > > > It upsets static analyzers when we don't check for allocation failure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > This applies cleanly neither to net nor net-next, please send me a > version that does. Oh yes, I failed to spot the filename. That function has since been moved to falcon.c. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.