Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	malcolm.crossley@citrix.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core: Order-3 frag allocator causes SWIOTLB bouncing under Xen
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:00:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378328440.7360.124.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378327638-23956-1-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>

On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 21:47 +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> THIS PATCH IS NOT INTENDED TO BE UPSTREAMED, IT HAS ONLY INFORMING PURPOSES!
> 
> I've noticed a performance regression with upstream kernels when used as Dom0
> under Xen. The classic kernel can utilize the whole bandwidth of a 10G NIC
> (ca. 9.3 Gbps), but upstream can reach only ca. 7 Gbps. I found that it
> happens because SWIOTLB has to do double buffering. The per task frag
> allocator introduced in 5640f7 creates 32 kb frags, which are not contiguous
> in mfn space.
> This patch provides a workaround by going back to the old way. The possible
> ideas came up to solve this:
> 
> * make sure Dom0 memory is contiguous: it sounds trivial, but doesn't work with
> driver domains, and there are lots of situations where this is not possible.
> * use PVH Dom0: so we will have IOMMU. In the future sometime.
> * use IOMMU with PV Dom0: this seems to happen earlier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
> ---
>  net/core/sock.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 2c097c5..854a0ea 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1812,7 +1812,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_skb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_alloc_send_skb);
>  
>  /* On 32bit arches, an skb frag is limited to 2^15 */
> -#define SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER	get_order(32768)
> +#define SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER	get_order(4096)
>  

Well, this hack is not new...

We have dev->gso_max_size and dev->gso_max_segs

We also have in net-next sk_pacing_rate and dynamic TSO sizing.

Maybe you could add proper infrastructure to deal with Xen limitations.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-04 20:47 [PATCH] net/core: Order-3 frag allocator causes SWIOTLB bouncing under Xen Zoltan Kiss
2013-09-04 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-09-04 21:11   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-05  7:39     ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2013-09-06 13:27       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1378328440.7360.124.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox