From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veaceslav Falico Subject: [PATCH net-next 13/26] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:16:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1378757804-3159-14-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> References: <1378757804-3159-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico , Jay Vosburgh , Andy Gospodarek To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4118 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755981Ab3IIUQx (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:16:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1378757804-3159-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if it's suitable. After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up slave or the slave whose link came back earliest. We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it won't go away. CC: Jay Vosburgh CC: Andy Gospodarek Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 43 ++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 2075321..b5497e7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -785,43 +785,24 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond) /** * find_best_interface - select the best available slave to be the active one * @bond: our bonding struct - * - * Warning: Caller must hold curr_slave_lock for writing. */ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond) { - struct slave *new_active, *old_active; - struct slave *bestslave = NULL; + struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL; + struct list_head *iter; int mintime = bond->params.updelay; - int i; - new_active = bond->curr_active_slave; - - if (!new_active) { /* there were no active slaves left */ - new_active = bond_first_slave(bond); - if (!new_active) - return NULL; /* still no slave, return NULL */ - } + if (bond->primary_slave && bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP && + bond_should_change_active(bond)) + return bond->primary_slave; - if ((bond->primary_slave) && - bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP && - bond_should_change_active(bond)) { - new_active = bond->primary_slave; - } - - /* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */ - old_active = new_active; - - bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) { - if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) { - return new_active; - } else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK && - IS_UP(new_active->dev)) { - /* link up, but waiting for stabilization */ - if (new_active->delay < mintime) { - mintime = new_active->delay; - bestslave = new_active; - } + bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { + if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) + return slave; + if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_BACK && IS_UP(slave->dev) && + slave->delay < mintime) { + mintime = slave->delay; + bestslave = slave; } } -- 1.8.4