netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 04/26] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it
Date: Mon,  9 Sep 2013 22:16:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378757804-3159-5-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378757804-3159-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>

Currently, even though we can access any linked device, we can't attach
anything to it, which is vital to properly manage them.

To fix this, add a new void *private to netdev_adjacent and functions
setting/getting it (per link), so that we can save, per example, bonding's
slave structures there, per slave device.

netdev_master_upper_dev_link_private(dev, upper_dev, private) links dev to
upper dev and populates the neighbour link only with private.

netdev_lower_dev_get_private{,_rcu}() returns the private, if found.

CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |  7 ++++
 net/core/dev.c            | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 2a944e5..eab8e36 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -2839,8 +2839,15 @@ extern int netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 				 struct net_device *upper_dev);
 extern int netdev_master_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 					struct net_device *upper_dev);
+extern int netdev_master_upper_dev_link_private(struct net_device *dev,
+						struct net_device *upper_dev,
+						void *private);
 extern void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
 				    struct net_device *upper_dev);
+extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+					      struct net_device *lower_dev);
+extern void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
+					  struct net_device *lower_dev);
 extern int skb_checksum_help(struct sk_buff *skb);
 extern struct sk_buff *__skb_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	netdev_features_t features, bool tx_path);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index eef99de..9528e8f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4376,6 +4376,9 @@ struct netdev_adjacent {
 	/* counter for the number of times this device was added to us */
 	u16 ref_nr;
 
+	/* private field for the users */
+	void *private;
+
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 };
@@ -4556,7 +4559,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu);
 static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
 					struct net_device *adj_dev,
 					bool neighbour, bool master,
-					bool upper)
+					bool upper, void *private)
 {
 	struct netdev_adjacent *adj, *neigh = NULL;
 
@@ -4599,9 +4602,15 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
 			 adj_dev->name);
 
 	if (!upper) {
-		if (neigh)
+		if (neigh) {
+			/* we're backlinging the master device to its
+			 * slave, so save the private in this link.
+			 */
+			if (master)
+				neigh->private = private;
 			list_add_tail_rcu(&neigh->list,
 					  &dev->adj_list.lower);
+		}
 		list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->all_adj_list.lower);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -4627,15 +4636,16 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
 				     bool master, bool neighbour)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, neighbour, master,
-					    true);
+					    true, NULL);
 }
 
 static int __netdev_lower_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
 				     struct net_device *ldev,
-				     bool neighbour)
+				     bool master, bool neighbour,
+				     void *private)
 {
-	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, false,
-					    false);
+	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, master,
+					    false, private);
 }
 
 void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -4703,7 +4713,8 @@ static void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
 
 int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
 				      struct net_device *upper_dev,
-				      bool master, bool neighbour)
+				      bool master, bool neighbour,
+				      void *private)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -4711,7 +4722,8 @@ int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = __netdev_lower_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, neighbour);
+	ret = __netdev_lower_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, master, neighbour,
+					private);
 	if (ret) {
 		__netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev);
 		return ret;
@@ -4723,14 +4735,15 @@ int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
 static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 				      struct net_device *udev)
 {
-	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, false, false);
+	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, false, false, NULL);
 }
 
 static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
 						struct net_device *udev,
-						bool master)
+						bool master, void *priv)
 {
-	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, master, true);
+	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, master, true,
+						 priv);
 }
 
 void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -4742,7 +4755,8 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
 
 
 static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
-				   struct net_device *upper_dev, bool master)
+				   struct net_device *upper_dev, bool master,
+				   void *private)
 {
 	struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j, *to_i, *to_j;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -4762,7 +4776,8 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (master && netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(dev, upper_dev, master);
+	ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(dev, upper_dev, master,
+						   private);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -4853,7 +4868,7 @@ rollback_mesh:
 int netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 			  struct net_device *upper_dev)
 {
-	return __netdev_upper_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, false);
+	return __netdev_upper_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, false, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_dev_link);
 
@@ -4871,10 +4886,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_dev_link);
 int netdev_master_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
 				 struct net_device *upper_dev)
 {
-	return __netdev_upper_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, true);
+	return __netdev_upper_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, true, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_link);
 
+int netdev_master_upper_dev_link_private(struct net_device *dev,
+					 struct net_device *upper_dev,
+					 void *private)
+{
+	return __netdev_upper_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, true, private);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_link_private);
+
 /**
  * netdev_upper_dev_unlink - Removes a link to upper device
  * @dev: device
@@ -4912,6 +4935,36 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_dev_unlink);
 
+void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				       struct net_device *lower_dev)
+{
+	struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+	if (!lower_dev)
+		return NULL;
+	lower = __netdev_lower_find_rcu(dev, lower_dev);
+	if (!lower)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return lower->private;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_dev_get_private_rcu);
+
+void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
+				   struct net_device *lower_dev)
+{
+	struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+	if (!lower_dev)
+		return NULL;
+	lower = __netdev_lower_find(dev, lower_dev);
+	if (!lower)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return lower->private;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_dev_get_private);
+
 static void dev_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *dev, int flags)
 {
 	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
-- 
1.8.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-09 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-09 20:16 [PATCH net-next 0/26] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 01/26] net: add adj_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 02/26] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 03/26] net: uninline netdev neighbour functions Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/26] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 06/26] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 07/26] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 08/26] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 09/26] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 10/26] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 11/26] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 12/26] bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 13/26] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 14/26] bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 15/26] bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 16/26] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 17/26] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 18/26] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 19/26] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 20/26] bonding: remove bond_prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 21/26] net: add a function to get the next private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 22/26] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 23/26] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 24/26] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 25/26] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-09 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next 26/26] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-10 11:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/26] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Ding Tianhong
2013-09-10 16:41 ` Veaceslav Falico

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1378757804-3159-5-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
    --to=vfalico@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).