Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [stable] [PATCH] sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() for recycled pages
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:54:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1379602464.1514.8.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]

This bug fix is only for stable branches older than 3.10.  The bug was
fixed upstream by commit 2768935a4660 ('sfc: reuse pages to avoid DMA
mapping/unmapping costs'), but that change is totally unsuitable for
stable.

Commit b590ace09d51 ('sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() in the presence of
swiotlb') added an explicit page_offset member to struct
efx_rx_buffer, which must be set consistently with the u.page and
dma_addr fields.  However, it failed to add the necessary assignment
in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer().  It also did not correct the calculation
of efx_rx_buffer::dma_addr in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(), which assumes
that DMA-mapping a page will result in a page-aligned DMA address
(exactly what swiotlb violates).

Add the assignment of efx_rx_buffer::page_offset and change the
calculation of dma_addr to make use of it.

I'm attaching the patches for 3.0.y, 3.2.y and 3.4.y (the last of which
should also be applicable to the later unofficial stable branches).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

[-- Attachment #2: sfc-Fix-efx_rx_buf_offset-for-recycled-pages-3.0.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1833 bytes --]

>From d4e70d42eff6938c12d7d0b12f657b10d06a156d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:39:20 +0100
Subject: sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() for recycled pages

This bug fix is only for stable branches older than 3.10.  The bug was
fixed upstream by commit 2768935a4660 ('sfc: reuse pages to avoid DMA
mapping/unmapping costs'), but that change is totally unsuitable for
stable.

Commit b590ace09d51 ('sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() in the presence of
swiotlb') added an explicit page_offset member to struct
efx_rx_buffer, which must be set consistently with the u.page and
dma_addr fields.  However, it failed to add the necessary assignment
in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer().  It also did not correct the calculation
of efx_rx_buffer::dma_addr in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(), which assumes
that DMA-mapping a page will result in a page-aligned DMA address
(exactly what swiotlb violates).

Add the assignment of efx_rx_buffer::page_offset and change the
calculation of dma_addr to make use of it.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/rx.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
index d429f0a..26e4cca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
@@ -311,8 +311,9 @@ static void efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue,
 
 	index = rx_queue->added_count & rx_queue->ptr_mask;
 	new_buf = efx_rx_buffer(rx_queue, index);
-	new_buf->dma_addr = rx_buf->dma_addr ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
 	new_buf->u.page = rx_buf->u.page;
+	new_buf->page_offset = rx_buf->page_offset ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
+	new_buf->dma_addr = state->dma_addr + new_buf->page_offset;
 	new_buf->len = rx_buf->len;
 	new_buf->is_page = true;
 	++rx_queue->added_count;
-- 
1.8.1.4


[-- Attachment #3: sfc-Fix-efx_rx_buf_offset-for-recycled-pages-3.2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1878 bytes --]

>From 43587737635de32882d9f69df36562e0d5b0e0bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:39:20 +0100
Subject: sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() for recycled pages

This bug fix is only for stable branches older than 3.10.  The bug was
fixed upstream by commit 2768935a4660 ('sfc: reuse pages to avoid DMA
mapping/unmapping costs'), but that change is totally unsuitable for
stable.

Commit b590ace09d51 ('sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() in the presence of
swiotlb') added an explicit page_offset member to struct
efx_rx_buffer, which must be set consistently with the u.page and
dma_addr fields.  However, it failed to add the necessary assignment
in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer().  It also did not correct the calculation
of efx_rx_buffer::dma_addr in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(), which assumes
that DMA-mapping a page will result in a page-aligned DMA address
(exactly what swiotlb violates).

Add the assignment of efx_rx_buffer::page_offset and change the
calculation of dma_addr to make use of it.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
index 9ce8665..c231b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
@@ -312,8 +312,9 @@ static void efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue,
 
 	index = rx_queue->added_count & rx_queue->ptr_mask;
 	new_buf = efx_rx_buffer(rx_queue, index);
-	new_buf->dma_addr = rx_buf->dma_addr ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
 	new_buf->u.page = rx_buf->u.page;
+	new_buf->page_offset = rx_buf->page_offset ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
+	new_buf->dma_addr = state->dma_addr + new_buf->page_offset;
 	new_buf->len = rx_buf->len;
 	new_buf->is_page = true;
 	++rx_queue->added_count;
-- 
1.8.1.4


[-- Attachment #4: sfc-Fix-efx_rx_buf_offset-for-recycled-pages-3.4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1888 bytes --]

>From 55961f9a914e637f143da275da42154a49c9743a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:39:20 +0100
Subject: sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() for recycled pages

This bug fix is only for stable branches older than 3.10.  The bug was
fixed upstream by commit 2768935a4660 ('sfc: reuse pages to avoid DMA
mapping/unmapping costs'), but that change is totally unsuitable for
stable.

Commit b590ace09d51 ('sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() in the presence of
swiotlb') added an explicit page_offset member to struct
efx_rx_buffer, which must be set consistently with the u.page and
dma_addr fields.  However, it failed to add the necessary assignment
in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer().  It also did not correct the calculation
of efx_rx_buffer::dma_addr in efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(), which assumes
that DMA-mapping a page will result in a page-aligned DMA address
(exactly what swiotlb violates).

Add the assignment of efx_rx_buffer::page_offset and change the
calculation of dma_addr to make use of it.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
index 7b3c068..62311ad3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c
@@ -311,8 +311,9 @@ static void efx_resurrect_rx_buffer(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue,
 
 	index = rx_queue->added_count & rx_queue->ptr_mask;
 	new_buf = efx_rx_buffer(rx_queue, index);
-	new_buf->dma_addr = rx_buf->dma_addr ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
 	new_buf->u.page = rx_buf->u.page;
+	new_buf->page_offset = rx_buf->page_offset ^ (PAGE_SIZE >> 1);
+	new_buf->dma_addr = state->dma_addr + new_buf->page_offset;
 	new_buf->len = rx_buf->len;
 	new_buf->flags = EFX_RX_BUF_PAGE;
 	++rx_queue->added_count;
-- 
1.8.1.4


             reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-19 14:54 Ben Hutchings [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-19 16:13 [stable] [PATCH] sfc: Fix efx_rx_buf_offset() for recycled pages Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1379602464.1514.8.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox