From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 13/27] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave()
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:46:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380023227-9576-14-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380023227-9576-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave
that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that
suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if
it's suitable.
After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up
slave or the slave whose link came back earliest.
We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in
bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it
won't go away.
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v3 -> v4:
No change.
v2 -> v3:
No change.
v1 -> v2:
No changes.
RFC -> v1:
New patch.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 43 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 85e99ae..6abbfac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -785,43 +785,24 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
/**
* find_best_interface - select the best available slave to be the active one
* @bond: our bonding struct
- *
- * Warning: Caller must hold curr_slave_lock for writing.
*/
static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
{
- struct slave *new_active, *old_active;
- struct slave *bestslave = NULL;
+ struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL;
+ struct list_head *iter;
int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
- int i;
- new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
-
- if (!new_active) { /* there were no active slaves left */
- new_active = bond_first_slave(bond);
- if (!new_active)
- return NULL; /* still no slave, return NULL */
- }
+ if (bond->primary_slave && bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP &&
+ bond_should_change_active(bond))
+ return bond->primary_slave;
- if ((bond->primary_slave) &&
- bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP &&
- bond_should_change_active(bond)) {
- new_active = bond->primary_slave;
- }
-
- /* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */
- old_active = new_active;
-
- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) {
- if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
- return new_active;
- } else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK &&
- IS_UP(new_active->dev)) {
- /* link up, but waiting for stabilization */
- if (new_active->delay < mintime) {
- mintime = new_active->delay;
- bestslave = new_active;
- }
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
+ return slave;
+ if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_BACK && IS_UP(slave->dev) &&
+ slave->delay < mintime) {
+ mintime = slave->delay;
+ bestslave = slave;
}
}
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 11:46 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/27] net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/27] net: add adj_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/27] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/27] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/27] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/27] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 19:19 ` David Miller
2013-09-24 19:39 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/27] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/27] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/27] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/27] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/27] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/27] bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 14/27] bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 15/27] bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 16/27] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 17/27] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 18/27] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 19/27] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 20/27] bonding: remove bond_prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 21/27] bonding: add __bond_next_slave() which uses neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 22/27] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 23/27] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 24/27] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 25/27] vlan: unlink the upper neighbour before unregistering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 26/27] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 27/27] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380023227-9576-14-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).