From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 27/27] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380023227-9576-28-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380023227-9576-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done
for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour.
The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like
lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device
bridge0.
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v3 -> v4:
Convert the logic to the new functions, which don't have the bool upper
argument.
v2 -> v3:
No change.
v1 -> v2:
No changes.
RFC -> v1:
Rename lower devices from slave_eth0 to lower_eth0, so that it meets
the lower/upper naming. I've searched for any active users of bonding's
slave_eth0, and seems that nobody's actively using it or relying on it.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 11 +----------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 21 ---------------------
drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 2 --
net/core/dev.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d494045..d5c3153 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1612,15 +1612,11 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
- res = bond_create_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- if (res)
- goto err_detach;
-
res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
new_slave);
if (res) {
pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_rx_handler_register\n", res);
- goto err_dest_symlinks;
+ goto err_detach;
}
res = bond_master_upper_dev_link(bond_dev, slave_dev, new_slave);
@@ -1642,9 +1638,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
err_unregister:
netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
-err_dest_symlinks:
- bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
-
err_detach:
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode))
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
@@ -1842,8 +1835,6 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
bond_dev->name, slave_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
/* must do this from outside any spinlocks */
- bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
-
vlan_vids_del_by_dev(slave_dev, bond_dev);
/* If the mode USES_PRIMARY, then this cases was handled above by
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index 1c57246..e06c644 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -168,27 +168,6 @@ static const struct class_attribute class_attr_bonding_masters = {
.namespace = bonding_namespace,
};
-int bond_create_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master,
- struct net_device *slave)
-{
- char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
-
- /* create a link from the master to the slave */
- sprintf(linkname, "slave_%s", slave->name);
- return sysfs_create_link(&(master->dev.kobj), &(slave->dev.kobj),
- linkname);
-}
-
-void bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master,
- struct net_device *slave)
-{
- char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
-
- sprintf(linkname, "slave_%s", slave->name);
- sysfs_remove_link(&(master->dev.kobj), linkname);
-}
-
-
/*
* Show the slaves in the current bond.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 18116ec..1fd37c8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -437,8 +437,6 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name);
int bond_create_sysfs(struct bond_net *net);
void bond_destroy_sysfs(struct bond_net *net);
void bond_prepare_sysfs_group(struct bonding *bond);
-int bond_create_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master, struct net_device *slave);
-void bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master, struct net_device *slave);
int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev);
int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev);
void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index de443ee..25ab6fe 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4584,6 +4584,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
int ret;
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -4606,12 +4607,26 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
+ &(adj_dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_adj;
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
+ &(adj_dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_adj;
+ }
+
/* Ensure that master link is always the first item in list. */
if (master) {
ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
&(adj_dev->dev.kobj), "master");
if (ret)
- goto free_adj;
+ goto remove_symlinks;
list_add_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list);
} else {
@@ -4620,6 +4635,15 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
+remove_symlinks:
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ }
+
free_adj:
kfree(adj);
@@ -4631,6 +4655,7 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head *dev_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -4650,6 +4675,14 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
if (adj->master)
sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), "master");
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ }
+
list_del_rcu(&adj->list);
pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
--
1.8.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 11:46 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/27] net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/27] net: add adj_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/27] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/27] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/27] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/27] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 19:19 ` David Miller
2013-09-24 19:39 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/27] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/27] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/27] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/27] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/27] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/27] bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/27] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 14/27] bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 15/27] bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 16/27] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 17/27] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 18/27] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 19/27] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 20/27] bonding: remove bond_prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 21/27] bonding: add __bond_next_slave() which uses neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 22/27] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 23/27] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 24/27] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 25/27] vlan: unlink the upper neighbour before unregistering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 26/27] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-24 11:47 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380023227-9576-28-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).