From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce SO_MAX_PACING_RATE Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:14:00 -0700 Message-ID: <1380035640.3165.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1379949014.3165.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , "Steinar H. Gunderson" , Michael Kerrisk To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:43418 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096Ab3IXPOD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:14:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id un15so4716990pbc.29 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1379949014.3165.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > + > + case SO_MAX_PACING_RATE: > + sk->sk_max_pacing_rate = val; > + break; > + I'll send a v2, adding here : sk->sk_pacing_rate = min(sk->sk_pacing_rate, sk->max_pacing_rate); to enforce current limit for non TCP protocols.